The Racist Roots of Gun Control

(Original Image: Second Amendment Institute)

“A Winchester rifle should have a place of honor in every black home, and it should be used for that protection which the law refuses to give.”  — Ida B. Wells

"The historical record provides compelling evidence that racism underlies gun control laws—and not in any subtle way," — historian Clayton Cramer, 1995

As early as the 1600s, colonies had rules and laws on the books that barred African Americans from owning firearms. For example, Virginia prohibited black people, whether free or enslaved, from carrying weapons.

A 1825 law in Florida authorized white people to “enter into all Negro houses” and “lawfully seize and take away all such arms, weapons, and ammunition.”(1) In Dred Scott v. Sandford, Chief Justice Roger Taney argued that one reason Black people could not be citizens under the Constitution was that it “would give to persons of the negro race” the right “to keep and carry arms wherever they went.”

After the 1831 slave uprising led by Nat Turner, Virginia reinforced its ban of Blacks carrying firearms, and Tennessee revised its constitutional guarantee of the right to arms, restricting it to "free white men."

Even after the Fourteenth Amendment’s ratification, many states implemented facially neutral gun control laws with a clear intent that they be stringently enforced in a discriminatory manner against disfavored populations like immigrants and African-Americans (Heritage Foundation).

Consider the words of a Florida Supreme Court Justice in a 1941 concurring opinion that analyzed a Reconstruction Era handgun licensing law:

The same condition existed when the Act was amended in 1901 and the Act was passed for the purpose of disarming the negro laborers….The statute was never intended to be applied to the white population and in practice has never been so applied. We have no statistics available, but it is a safe guess to assume that more than 80% of the white men living in rural sections of Florida have violated this statute…[but there has] never been, within my knowledge, any effort to enforce the provisions of this statute as to white people.

After the Civil War, the Black Codes (1865-1866) enacted in the South made it a crime for a Black person to have a gun.

Fast forward a century later in the 1960s during the Civil Rights Movement; Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. was denied a concealed carry permit even after his house was firebombed.

The facts presented above provide substantial incontrovertible evidence that our nations history of gun control is deeply rooted in racism.

(1) Robert J. Cottrol & Raymond T. Diamond, The Second Amendment: Toward an Afro-Americanist Reconsideration, in Gun Control and the Constitution: Sources and Explorations on the Second Amendment 403, 403 (Robert J. Cottrol ed., 1994).

Large Capacity Magazines Under Fire!

(Image Courtesy of FirearmsBlog.com)

Feb. 13, 2024, Hanson v. DC (2023) was heard before the U.S. Court of Appeals (DC Circuit). Hanson and fellow plaintiffs including our Executive Director Tyler Yzaguirre, argued that Large Capacity Magazines are "arms" protected by the Second Amendment's "common use" self-defense doctrine.

Washington, DC attorneys argued that the Court cannot assume that "all" LCMs are used for lawful self-defense purposes, and are therefore not protected by the Second Amendment.

WHERE DO THE JUSTICES STAND?

Circuit Court Judge Ginsburg (Reagan Appointee) argued that in the past 5 years of mass shootings, less than 10 have included LMCs.

Circuit Court Judge Walker (Trump Appointee) argued that the federal government, through various programs, has handed out more than 250,000 LCMs to professional sports shooters.

Circuit Court Judge Millett (Obama Appointee) argued that if just because a facet of firearms is in widespread circulation, doesn't mean it's being used for "lawful self-defense purposes."

The Second Amendment Institute believes this will come down to a 2-1 ruling in favor of Hanson.

Listen to the oral arguments here.

Washington Post story here.

2023 Wrapped Up

SAI Ends 2023 With A Bang!

SAI’s 2023 highlights include attending the Leadership Institute’s 50th Fourth of July Soiree as a platinum sponsor, voting on a new Board of Director Member, hosting four major Second Amendment events, sponsoring the Washington DCYR Christmas Party, and joining forces with Women for Gun Rights (formerly DC Project) at a U.S. House Judiciary Committee Hearing.

Read the full report here.

Strangling the Second Amendment

By Tyler Yzaguirre

August 2, 2022

 

On July, 212 despicable Democrats and 2 reprehensible Republicans passed H.R. 1808, the Assault Weapons Ban of 2022, penned by gun-grab communist Congressman David Cicilline which was introduced in March 2021.

 

The bill's summary reads, 

 

"This bill makes it a crime to knowingly import, sell, manufacture, transfer, or possess a semi-automatic assault weapon (SAW) or large capacity ammunition feeding device (LCAFD)."

 

Specifically, this bill bans what it dubs "semi-automatic assault weapons," which include a long list of arbitrary items including a grenade launcher feature.

 

Worse yet, H.R. 1808 bans all AR and AK models. 

 

In full disclosure, H.R. 1808 does contain a Grandfather Clause protecting currently owned so called assault weapons, but overbears the owner with draconian and tyrannical rules to follow. 

 

H.R. 1808 imposes the following measures on grandfathered semi-automatic assault weapons: 

  • Safe storage laws

  • Heavily regulated background checks for private sales/transfers

  • Limiting temporary custody

  • Restricted transportation and usage

 

According to the National Shooting Sports Foundation (NSSF), there are 20 million legally owned AR-15s in circulation throughout the country; they are part of a total of 393 million guns owned by U.S. civilians

 

Thanks to HellerMcDonald, and Bruen clarifying and strengthening the Second Amendment, law-abiding citizens stand firm in their Constitutional right to keep and bear arms, unconnected from military service, within and outside their homes for self-defense. 

 

According to Heller and Caetano, the Second Amendment applies to all "weapons in common use" despite their non-existence in 1791. 

 

By passing such heinous legislation, Cicilline and his Congressional Comrades are directly violating their Oath to the Constitution and ignoring the law of the land handed down by the United States Supreme Court. 

 

But as we know, Demagogue Democrats only care about control and strengthening their grip of tyranny to bleed every drop of freedom out of We The People; they strengthen their grip by lying to Americans and manipulating the emotions of those most vulnerable.

 

The biggest lie in gun-grab Democrats' playbook is the term "Assault Weapon." 

 

There is no such thing as an assault weapon. 

 

The origin of the term “Assault Weapon” is not 100% clear. 

 

According to the Nexis News database, the first mention of “assault weapons” appeared in a 1980 New York Times story. Over the past several decades, gun-control proponents have heavily relied on this terminology and have blanket-applied it to any firearm they want to restrict. 

 

Fast-forward to 1994 when Democrats passed the first Assault Weapons Ban that miserably failed. A Congressionally mandated study of the federal assault weapons ban from 1994-2004 found that the ban had no impact on crime. 

 

It concluded, "Should it be renewed, the ban's effect on gun violence is likely to be small at best." - Christopher S. Koper, report to the National Institute of Justice, June 2004. 

 

Gun control activists rely heavily on fear-based language to persuade Americans that guns are inherently evil and that the only solution is to pass stricter gun control laws. Assault is an action, a verb, not a noun. 

 

According to the FBI Expanded Homicide Crime Explorer, from 2010-2020, 5,034 homicides involved a blunt object (hammer, club, etc.), whereas only 3,385 homicides involved a rifle. Unfortunately, the data does not specify what type of rifles. 

 

If the Gun Control Cabal wanted to curb crime, they would focus on blunt object legislation.

 

Regardless of legislation or laws, criminals will have access to illegal firearms, and law-abiding citizens will be sitting ducks, ripe for theft, assault, rape, and murder. 

 

The future of our Second Amendment rights depends on patriotic Americans stepping up for the fight. No matter what gun control proponents throw at us, we must remain vigilant. 

 

"Eternal vigilance is the price of liberty." - Thomas Jefferson

Donate to the Second Amendment Institute today so that it can continue to educate millions of Americans per year about their Second Amendment rights. Make your tax-deductible contribution here.

 

Tyler Yzaguirre is a gun rights policy expert, President of the Second Amendment Institute, and author of Gun Rights 101. You can follow him on Twitter @RealTylerYz.

Activists File Lawsuit Against D.C.'s Metro Carry Ban

JULY 2, 2022

June 30, 2022 — SAI Board Member and expert Second Amendment Attorney, George Lyon (Arsenal Attorneys), filed a lawsuit listing four Washington D.C. residents as plaintiffs, challenging Washington D.C.’s ban on metro concealed carry by concealed carry licensed residents.

One of those plaintiffs is Second Amendment Institute President Tyler Yzaguirre.

###

UPDATES:

1/5/23 - Federally Appointed Obama Judge, Judge Moss, denies lawsuit, says plaintiffs have lack of standing. Read More here.

9/20 - Amicus Briefs Filed Against Plaintiffs From Everytown for Gun Safety, Brady Campaign, and Illinois

Download: Everytown Brief - Brady Campaign - Illinois

9/19 - Washington, D.C. Responds to Lawsuit: D.C. Argument:

1) Plaintiffs Lack Standing Because They Have Failed to Allege An Injury-in-Fact
2) Plaintiffs Are Unlikely to Succeed on the Merits Because the Metro Law Governs “Sensitive Places.” — Plaintiffs can take an alternate route instead of the Metro.
3) Plaintiffs Will Not Suffer Imminent, Irreparable Harm Absent of Relief
4) The Balance of Equities and Public Interest Weigh Against an Injunction
5) Plaintiffs Are Not Entitled to Summary Judgement or Trial Based on the Merits

News Coverage: WUSA9

9/13 - NOTICE BY THE UNITED STATES OF POTENTIAL PARTICIPATION: The United States is considering whether to file a Statement of Interest in this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sect. 517. The statute authorizes the Attorney General of the United States to send any officer of the Department of Justice to “attend to the interests of the United States in a suit pending in a court of the United States, or in the courts of a State, or to attend any other interest of the United States.”

7/12 - Preliminary Injunction Filed — Read Here: PDF

7/11 - Judge Randolph Daniel Moss assigned to case

###

The lawsuit, filed in U.S. District Court in Washington, cites the Supreme Court’s June 23 decision that makes it harder for governments to restrict the carrying of pistols outside the home. Writing for the court’s 6-to-3 conservative majority, Justice Clarence Thomas said that to ban concealed handguns in a particular place, “the government must demonstrate that the regulation is consistent with this Nation’s historical tradition of firearm regulation.”

Read the full article: Washington Post

TV Coverage: WUSA9ABC7

Also Covered In: Fox 5DCistWTOPLAW.comThe HillEpoch TimesWMAL

Read Full Complaint: PDF

Read Preliminary Injunction: PDF

Lawsuits like these and others are not cheap — Donate $50 or more today to SAI’s Legal Defense War Chest and receive your Legal Defense Patriot Package which includes:


• Two of the hottest gun rights books on the market
• Pocket Constitution
• Gun Rights Button

BREAKING: Senate Gun Control Bill Released

Via Townhall, June 21, 2022:

A bipartisan working group of U.S. Senators — 10 Democrats and 10 Republicans — finally unveiled the result of their work on federal firearm legislation spurred by the tragic shooting at an elementary school in Uvalde, Texas, one that increasingly looks to have been worsened by a failure in local authorities' response.

The text's release was delayed this week by some last-minute negotiations over a ban on any healthcare-related funds in the bill being used to pay for abortions, but that hurdle was cleared by Tuesday afternoon when the final text was released.

Full text of the bill can be viewed here:
https://www.scribd.com/document/579228693/Senate-Bipartisan-Safer-Communities-Act

As you can see from our image above, the main topics in the bill covered are:
Mental Health
Firearms
Other Matters

The Renewed Assualt On Our Gun Rights

Gun-grab politicians like Chuck Schumer, Nancy Pelosi, and others, along with gun control organizations like Moms Demand Action, have renewed their Second Amendment assault for 2022 by going full steam ahead in the media pushing lies about the gun facts.

 Moms Demand Action Executive Director Shannon Watts constantly spouts gun control lies via her Twitter like:

Stand Your Ground, coupled with Florida’s lax regulations on guns and background checks is an attitude. It’s the message that anything goes in your exercise of your constitutional rights, whether it be vigilantism or recklessness. #flapol

-       2/10/2022

 

Stand Your Ground Laws are from “an attitude” or “anything goes”…Watts focuses on these trigger phrases, which she knows will cause an emotional reaction in her supporter base, and cause them to sound the alarm on stricter gun control.

 

The key part of Watts’s Tweet is “…exercise of your constitutional rights…”, which Stand Your Ground laws exactly are.

 

Watts also likes to ignore current federal law and spout lies about background checks, as seen from a Tweet of hers on February 9, 2022:

 

“Right now, people convicted of misdemeanor domestic violence are only prohibited gun purchasers if they were married to, lived with, or share a child with their victim. This law ignores the reality that women are as likely to be killed by an abusive dating partner as a spouse.”

 

According to Form 4473 which every purchaser of a firearm is required to fill out at an FFL dealer, you can be denied purchase if you are under “indictment or information in any court for a felony, or any other crime for which the judge could imprison you for more than one year” (21b) or if you have you ever been “convicted in any court of a misdemeanor crime of domestic violence…” (21i).

 

Again, Watts is flat out lying to her core base.

 

You do not have to be related to – as Watts puts it – “married to, lived with, or share a child with their victim…” in order to be denied the purchase.

 

I tried to respond to Watts’s Tweets via my personal Twitter of @RealTylerYz and the Second Amendment Institute’s @SaiNAtional, but to no surprise, Watts blocked both of our accounts.

Gun grabbers, who the majority of the time are flat out liars, or too ignorant to know the truth, are not willing to sit down and have an open discussion about the Second Amendment.

Other big control lies being spewed by radical gun grabbers and shared on social media include:

 

-       AR-15s are assault rifles

-       Guns are the leading cause of death in the United States

-       We need to pass stricter gun control

-       More guns equal more crime

You can find these lies and more debunked in my new book: Gun Rights 101 on Amazon.

 

Then there’s this from Moms Demand Action Tweeted on February 8, 2022

According to Shannon Watts and Moms Demand Action, men who “heavily arm themselves” are automatic “misogynists”…

 

The argument structure of gun grabbers has gone from flat out lies to flat out stupidity.

But, this shouldn’t be surprising because gun grabbers, like Watts, only care about power and self-glorification. If she actually cared about solving whatever issues she thinks are issues, she wouldn’t be blocking pro-Second Amendment advocates on Twitter. Rather, she’d be having discussions with them.

 

Anti-freedom organizations like Moms Demand Action, Everytown for Gun Safety, and others, tap into the emotions of their followers to create a knee-jerk reaction that turns into crazed gun-grabbers spewing misinformation garbage on their social media accounts and radicalizing once level-headed Americans.

 

At the end of the day, you and I as rational law-abiding gun owners need to do all that we can to combat the lies of radical gun grabbers, and demonstrate the truth of the matter.

 

This is the only way we can change the hearts and minds of Americans and ensure that our Second Amendment rights are well preserved for future generations.

—————————-

The Second Amendment Institute is a 501c3 non-profit organization that relies on tax-deductible donations from Second Amendment supporters like YOU. Get involved by joining today: https://www.sainational.org/join or donate here: https://www.sainational.org/support

Tyler Yzaguirre • February 10, 2022

2021 Review

The Second Amendment Institute’s 2021 Review:

Board of Directors: George Lyon, Esq., Cheryl Todd, Dania Vizzi, Beth Walker, Maj Toure, Sen. Elbert Guillory, Kaya Jones, KaLeigh Long.

Executive Officers: Tyler Yzaguirre (President), Zak Tretton (CFO), Colonel Rob Maness, ret. (Veterans Affairs), Chris Hunt (External Operations), Liberte Austin (National Field Director).


SAI PROUD TO BE RANKED AMONG TOP NON-PROFITS

For three years in a row, the Second Amendment Institute has ranked among the top 3.7% of non-profits in the country for transparency and fiduciary responsibility.

Per GuideStar -- the leading non-profit ranking company -- SAI maintains an "open book" policy which adheres the highest level.

Additionally, all Board Members and Executive Officers work on a volunteer basis, and as such, are not paid.

This allows 100% of tax-deductible donations to be utilized into SAI's programs and make a bigger impact for the Second Amendment.


SAI'S IMPACT ON SECOND AMENDMENT RIGHTS

EDUCATE. ACTIVATE. EMPOWER.

SAI reached more than 2 million Americans this year through its online advocacy presence. Through social media outlets like Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram, SAI was able to get its gun rights message to new and current Second Amendment supporters.

SAI also offers it's due-paying members exclusive gun rights resources through their very own Members page on the SAI website. Membership grew by 33%.


DIRECT GRASSROOTS IMPACT

This year SAI hosted:

  • Know Your Rights: DC - 3/18/21

  • The 2nd Protects the Other 26 (with Turning Point USA) - 3/21/21

  • Rally for Our Rights: Delaware - 4/11/21 (Co-Host)

  • DC Project - NJ Fundraiser - 5/15/21 (Sponsor)

MAJOR EVENTS:

Five Year Anniversary with Congresswoman Lauren Boebert - 6/26
Congresswoman Boebert accepted her SAI Lapel Pin and endorsed the Second Amendment Institute for it’s positive impact on gun rights.

(Photoed Left to Right: Congresswoman Lauren Boebert, SAI President Tyler Yzaguirre)

Defending Freedom Action Summit - 9/25-26

Two-day, jam-packed conference featuring former U.S. Secretary Ryan Zinke headlining and other national 2A speakers. Hosted in Richmond, VA.


DEFENDING FREEDOM'S FUTURE

1) SAI runs Students for Self-Defense - a national organization of college students from across the country who are trained how to effectively defend their self-defense rights on college campuses and overturn harmful restrictive self-defense policies.


2) Lawsuits - Board Member George Lyon is an expert Second Amendment attorney with more than 30 years experience. SAI files legal gun rights briefs and federal lawsuits to defend every law-abiding citizen's right to self-defense and the Second Amendment.

September 2021: George Lyon filed a federal lawsuit challenging Washington, DC's ban on ghost guns.

October 2021: Washington, DC overturned it's ban on ghost guns in fear of loss in court.


SAI DONATION UTILIZATION

EXPENDITURES:

10% Operations

> Website maintenance, domain, and hosting

> Business supplies: Cards, pens, office supplies

20% Business Operations

> Business expenses while in the field

> Donor appreciation (thank you gifts)

> Direct Mail

70% Mission Execution

> Events (A/V, venue rental, MISC.)

> Honorariums (Speaker hotels and travel)

> Social Media / Website Ads

FUNDRAISING:

60% Personal solicitation: from supporters like you

40% Sponsorships

0% Federal Grants

0% Grants


2022 PLAN

> Get back on college campuses.

• Recruit at least 500 students.

• Overturn at least 6 policies.

> Host smaller events focused in target areas.

• Rather than host an annual conference for $30,000, SAI can host up to 30 events across the country that cost $1,000 each.

> File at least 5 federal lawsuits.

• This is one of the most effective ways to challenge unconstitutional gun control laws.

> Expand our member base by at least 40% more.

> Produce more original gun rights literature.

We Need to Defend America's Rifle

wwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww-900x450.jpg

MONDAY MARCH 29, 2021
SECOND AMENDMENT INSTITUTE


The National Shooting Sports Foundation estimates there are roughly 8-12 million legally owned AR-15s owned by law-abiding Americans.

In 2008, Justice Scalia wrote the magnificent decision of DC v. Heller which finally settled the debate: Yes, Americans have the individual right to own firearms and the government can not flat out ban firearms. In 2010, the United States Supreme Court strengthened the Heller ruling in Chicago v. McDonald, which applied the Heller ruling to the states through the 14th Amendment.

A major key takeaway from the Heller decision is that firearms in “common use” are protected by the Second Amendment. 8 to 12 million legally owned firearms of a particular make and model certainly qualify for “common use.”

Despite these facts and Constitutional protections, gun-grab politicians, media elites, and billionaire bullies want to take away America’s favorite rifle.

Gun grabbers of the Left have always been champions at manipulating the emotions of the masses and producing irrational fear and misguided ideologies about firearms and the Second Amendment.

In particular with their tyrannical tirade to flat-out ban the AR-15, they perpetuate the false narrative that it’s the “favorite” gun of mass shooters and that it should be banned because it looks scary.

However, if we take a look into the numbers and facts, their lies don’t add up.

First and foremost, the term “Assault-Weapon” is a made-up term by the gun control lobby to strike fear into the hearts and minds of Americans. Gun control activists rely very heavily on fear-based language to persuade Americans that guns are inherently evil and that the only solution is to pass stricter gun control laws.

Assault is an action; it’s a verb, not a noun. Firearms have no soul, they’re not living objects, and they are not inherently evil. You could put a loaded firearm on a table, leave it there, and unless somebody picked it up, aimed it, and pulled the trigger; the firearm would remain harmless. That settles the debate of “guns don’t kill people, people kill people.”

The origin of this term “Assault-Weapon” is not one hundred percent clear. According to the Nexis News database, the first mention of “assault weapons” appeared in a 1980 New York Times story. Over the past several decades, gun-control proponents have heavily relied on this terminology and have blanket-applied it to any firearm that looked scary.

Secondly, gun-control proponents now slap the term “assault” onto any firearm they don’t like or want to be restricted from public use. The public mistakes the “AR” in AR-15 to mean “assault rifle,” while fake news headquarters CNN, frequently refers to AR-15’s as “assault rifles.” The “AR” in “AR-15” stands for “ArmaLite Rifle,” the company that first manufactured the AR-15 in December 1959.

If we look at past mass shootings in which criminals utilized the AR-15 to carry out their heinous and unforgivable crimes, there are currently federal laws in place, which if enforced, would have prevented them from acquiring firearms:

  1. Nikolas Cruz: The FBI admitted to not following established follow up protocols which would have barred Cruz from purchasing firearms

  2. Devin Patrick Kelley: Kelley was dishonorably discharged from the military, which automatically bars someone from ever purchasing firearms again.

  3. Omar Mateen: Mateen had been on the FBI’s suspected terrorist list, investigated twice by the FBI for terrorism, and convicted of misdemeanor hate crimes.

  4. Syed Rizwan Farook and Tashfeen Malik: Farook and Malik did not purchase their firearms. The firearms used in the massacre were a “straw purchase” bought by Enrique Marquez Jr., who pleaded guilty in February 2017.


FBI stats show knives kill far more people than rifles in America, it’s not even close.

According to the FBI crime statistics, in 2019, homicides overall — 10,258 — the number of homicides committed using a rifle (364) is much smaller. Handguns were listed as the primary weapon in 6,368 cases, and shotguns accounted for another 200. In addition, 600 people were killed in 2019 with what the FBI refers to as “personal weapons,” meaning hands, fists or feet. Knives or other “cutting tools” accounted for another 1,476 homicides — about three times the number killed by rifles.

While the AR-15 does appear to be the weapon of choice for the more highly-publicized mass shootings, the fact that any instance in which at least four people are shot and killed is qualified as a “mass shooting” means that the numbers can be dramatically skewed by gang-related and drug-related activity.

- Daily Caller

If we allow tyrannical gun-grab politicians to ban America’s rifle, what’s next? Senator Dianne Feinstein’s legislation proposes banning over 200 different types of rifles.

This is madness.

The reasoning behind their constant need to assault our Second Amendment rights? Control.

The radical left has never cared about the security of our nation; they only care about controlling the masses. By tapping into the emotions of Americans and pretending to care, they keep getting re-elected and maintain their power over the people.

The case above lays out clear reasoning as to why we can not give up on the fight to protect America’s rifle.

The next time you get into a debate or discussion about why it’s so important we protect the AR-15, you can use these helpful facts to dismantle any gun-grabbers irrational, misguided argument, and stop them in their tracks:

  1. The AR in AR-15 stands for ArmaLite Rifle, the company that first developed them.

  2. There is no such thing as an “assault rifle”. The term was coined in the 1990s by the New York Times and radical Democrats to pass their assault weapons ban.

  3. The AR-15 is not the “weapon of choice” for mass shooters. Only mass shootings that involve an AR-15 receive national attention because the radical left wants to ban them.

  4. Roughly 3.5% percent of homicides in 2019 involved an AR-15 or similar rifle. In fact, knives are used 50% more than firearms in homicides.

  5. There are more than 20,000 gun control laws on the books. If gun control actually stopped crime, it would work by now.

The New Wave of Gun Control

SECOND AMENDMENT INSTITUTE
MARCH 1, 2021


One of our most famous Founding Fathers put it quite simply: “No free man shall ever be disbarred the use of arms.” – Thomas Jefferson.

 
The Founding Fathers understood the importance of the People, not the Militia, being armed.

 
Yet members of the radical left have turned their back on our nation’s Founding Fathers and have strayed from their command that the right to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.

 
The following gun control bills have been introduced in the 117th Congress so far:
 

H.R.121 - Gun Violence Reduction Resources Act of 2021 – Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee, D-TX-18: To provide for the hiring of 200 additional Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives agents and investigators to enforce gun laws.
 

H.R.125 - Gun Safety: Not Sorry Act of 2021 - Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee, D-TX-18: To amend title 18, United States Code, to provide for a 7-day waiting period before a semiautomatic firearm, a silencer, armor piercing ammunition, or a large capacity ammunition magazine may be transferred.
 

H.R.127 - Sabika Sheikh Firearm Licensing and Registration Act - Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee, D-TX-18: To provide for the licensing of firearm and ammunition possession and the registration of firearms, and to prohibit the possession of certain ammunition.
 

H.R.130 - Kimberly Vaughan Firearm Safe Storage Act - Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee, D-TX-18: To require the safe storage of firearms and ammunition, and to require the investigation of reports of improper storage of firearms or ammunition.
 

H.R.167 - To prohibit the transfer of a firearm at a gun show by a person who is not a federally licensed firearms dealer. -  Rep. Al Green D-TX-9: To prohibit the transfer of a firearm at a gun show by a person who is not a federally licensed firearms dealer.
 

H.R.545 - No Congressional Gun Loophole Act – Rep. Jared Huffman D-CA-2: To amend title 40, United States Code, to prevent Members of Congress and their employees from carrying firearms in the Capitol building, and for other purposes.

H.R.825 - Gun Violence Prevention Research Act of 2021 – Rep. Carolyn Maloney D-NY-12: To authorize the appropriation of funds to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention for conducting or supporting research on firearms safety or gun violence prevention.

 
H.R.882 - Keeping Guns from High-Risk Individuals Act – Rep. Robin Kelly D-IL-2: To amend chapter 44 of title 18, United States Code, to prohibit the sale or other disposition of a firearm to, and the possession, shipment, transportation, or receipt of a firearm by, certain classes of high-risk individuals.

 
H.R.1004 - To prohibit the sale of a firearm to, and the purchase of a firearm by, a person who is not covered by appropriate liability insurance coverage. – Rep. Carolyn Maloney D-NY-12.

H.R.1446 - Enhanced Background Checks Act of 2021 - Rep. James Clyburn D-SC-6: To amend chapter 44 of title 18, United States Code, to strengthen the background check procedures to be followed before a Federal firearms licensee may transfer a firearm to a person who is not such a licensee.


As patriotic, law-abiding citizens, we know that these gun control bills have nothing to do with keeping America safe. They’re all about control.

We’re coming to the point in America – the land of the free, innocent until proven guilty – where gun control plans like listed above, are now normalized.

 
Over one dozen states have red flag laws on the book, which allow police to seize your firearms without due process. It’s to the point where our country no longer accepts the standard of innocent until proven guilty, but guilty until proven innocent.

Joseph Stalin once said: “If the opposition disarms, well and good. If it refuses to disarm, we shall disarm it ourselves.”

And unfortunately, if the radical left continues to get its way, on the federal and state level, that’s where we’ll end up.

Congress is going down the anti-Second Amendment path, and so is the White House. Recently, Joe Biden has made his plans clear:

This Administration will not wait for the next mass shooting to heed that call. We will take action to end our epidemic of gun violence and make our schools and communities safer. Today, I am calling on Congress to enact commonsense gun law reforms, including requiring background checks on all gun sales, banning assault weapons and high-capacity magazines, and eliminating immunity for gun manufacturers who knowingly put weapons of war on our streets. We owe it to all those we’ve lost and to all those left behind to grieve to make a change. The time to act is now.”


Joe Biden and his minions in Congress are no friends of the Second Amendment. They want to be able to control We the People.

They should try picking up a history book and remind themselves of what happened the last time a tyrannical government tried to control We the People.

Biden's Second Amendment Assault

President Joe Biden’s radical assault on the Second Amendment could lead to a modern-day civil war.

Tyler Yzaguirre, President
Second Amendment Institute
Monday, February 15, 2021

Joe Biden is ramping up his full out assault on our Second Amendment rights.

Biden, who has never been a fan of the Second Amendment, and has shown signs that he’s a terrible gun-owner himself (like the time he told Americans to shoot a double-barrel shotgun off your porch if there was an intruder), now holds the most powerful elected position in the world, and he intends on abusing that power to eliminate our Second Amendment rights.

In a Tweet on February 14, Biden vowed to take new steps to take away guns from law-abiding Americans.

Screen Shot 2021-02-15 at 9.10.04 AM.png

This is something we knew would come eventually from the Clown-In-Chief.

Biden’s unconstitutional measures include:

  • Ban AR-15s

  • Ban high-capacity magazines (10+)

  • Mandatory registration of all long guns

  • $200 tax on all long guns

  • Monthly limitations on handgun purchases

  • Federalization of red flag laws

  • Tax-payer funding of gun violence research

    Biden regularly claims tougher gun control would reduce crime. However, gun violence is at its highest in cities like Chicago and New York - which have stringent gun control already in place.

    Furthermore, should someone with the mental capacity of Joe Biden even be allowed to wield such power? One day Joe say’s “You don’t need an AR-15”, the next day he says “I’ll take away your AR-14s”.

    “Come on man”, get your facts straight.

— The Second Amendment Institute relies on the generous support of patriotic Americans like you to keep up the good fight for the Second Amendment. Please consider making a tax-deductible gift today at our secure link: https://sainational.revv.co/donate

Tyler Yzaguirre is the President of the Second Amendment Institute and can be followed on Twitter at @RealTylerYz

Supreme Court Will Decide Whether Police Can Enter A Home To Seize Guns Without A Warrant

From Forbes from Evan Gerstmann Senior Contributor
Originally Posted on Forbes.com

Image courtesy of Axios.

Image courtesy of Axios.

The 4th Amendment right against warrantless searches of a person’s home is a pillar of Americans’ constitutional liberties. Before a police officer, or any other government official, can enter your home, they must show a judge that they have probable cause that they will discover specific evidence of a crime. 


There are some limited exceptions to this right. There is an “exigent circumstances” exception. If a police officer looks through a home’s window and sees a person about to stab another person, the officer can burst through the door to prevent the attack. There is also the “emergency aid” exception. If the officer looked through the same window and saw the resident collapsing from an apparent heart attack, the officer could run into the house to administer aid. Neither of these cases violates the 4th Amendment and few would argue that it should be otherwise. 


However, there is a broader cousin to these amendments called the “community caretaking” exception. It originally derives from a case in which the police took a gun out of the trunk of an impounded vehicle without first obtaining a warrant. The Supreme Court held that there is a community caretaking exception to the 4th Amendment’s warrant requirement because police perform “community caretaking functions, totally divorced from the detection, investigation, or acquisition of evidence relating to the violation of a criminal statute." The Court held that police activity in furtherance of these functions does not violate the 4th Amendment as long as it is executed in a “reasonable” manner.


Note that, unlike the first two exceptions, this exception is not limited to immediate emergencies. In the Supreme Court case just described there was only a general concern that vandals might eventually break into the impounded car and steal any weapons that were in the trunk. So the community care exception is far broader than the other two.


Also, all three exceptions allow warrantless searches so long as the police officer acted “reasonably”. That is one of the easiest constitutional standards to meet and is a significantly lower standard than “probable cause”, which is required for a warrant. As long as an officer might reasonably think that a warrantless search will alleviate a danger to the community, the search is considered constitutional.


There is a vigorous debate about whether the community care exception can apply to searches of a person’s home as well as of their car. Vehicles have always had less 4th Amendment protection than homes, which are considered a person’s most private sphere. Federal courts have been divided on this question and the Supreme Court has not ruled on it until now.


The Court has just announced that it will hear arguments next month on a case that presents this issue: Caniglia v. Strom. In this case, Mr. Caniglia was arguing with his wife and melodramatically put an unloaded gun on the table and said “shoot me now and get it over with.” His wife called a non-emergency number for the police who arrived shortly thereafter. The police disagreed about whether Mr. Caniglia was acting “normal” or “agitated” but they convinced him to take an ambulance to the local hospital for evaluation. The police did not accompany him.


While he was on his way to the hospital, Mrs. Caniglia told the police that her husband kept two handguns in the home. The police decided to search his home for the guns without obtaining a warrant. (Mrs. Caniglia’s consent to have the police search their home was legally negated because the police untruthfully told her that her husband had consented to the seizure of any guns.) The police located and seized the two guns. Mr. Caniglia sued for the violation of his 4th Amendment right to privacy and his 2nd Amendment right to keep handguns in the home for self-protection.


The 1st Circuit Court of Appeals (which is the federal court just below the Supreme Court in Caniglia’s jurisdiction) sided with the police. The court wrote: “At its core, the community caretaking doctrine is designed to give police elbow room to take appropriate action when unforeseen circumstances present some transient hazard that requires immediate attention. Understanding the core purpose of the doctrine leads inexorably to the conclusion that it should not be limited to the motor vehicle context. Threats to individual and community safety are not confined to the highways.”


It is certainly true that the police need a good deal of discretion in carrying out their varied, complex, and sometimes dangerous duties. But they are also powerful agents of the government and their power is supposed to be restrained by the Bill of Rights. The 4th Amendment is supposed to protect the home above all other places. And whatever one’s views on gun control may be, the Supreme Court has clearly held that the right to keep handguns in the home is at the core of the 2nd Amendment.


Unlike the “exigent circumstances” and “emergency aid” exceptions, the community caretaking exception is not limited to circumstances where there is no time to apply for a warrant. And the question of what sort of caretaking falls under this exception is extremely vague. Will the police be able to use it to, for example, conduct warrantless searches of political protesters’ homes to make sure they aren’t planning on violent behavior at their next political rally? The Supreme Court is going to take a very close look at this case and there is a good chance that they will overrule the lower court’s decision.

Never Enough: New Zealand Set for SECOND Gun Confiscation

Originally posted on NRA-ILA, Feb 1, 2021

Image courtesy of NRA-ILA

Image courtesy of NRA-ILA

New Zealand’s beleaguered gun owners are bracing for a second round of gun confiscations following a raft of new gun control measures enacted last summer that are set to take effect on February 1. Kiwi shooters will have until August 1 to turn over their prohibited items or face severe criminal penalties.

On March 21, 2019, Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern targeted New Zealand's law-abiding gun owners by unilaterally halting the sale of semi-automatic centerfire firearms that utilize detachable magazines to normal gun owners. The Arms Amendment Act 2019 was passed into law on April 10 and received royal assent the following day. The key provision of the legislation outlawed possession of all semi-automatic centerfire rifles and their magazines. The legislation also prohibited pump-action and semi-automatic shotguns with detachable magazines or a non-detachable magazine capable of accepting more than 5 rounds and any .22 caliber and lower rimfire semi-automatic rifle “that has a magazine, whether or not detachable or otherwise externally fed, that is capable of holding no more than 10 cartridges.”

In order to enforce the ban, the legislation provided for a firearm confiscation scheme. As with Australia's 1996 national firearms "buyback" program, law-abiding New Zealand gun owners were forced to turn their lawfully-acquired property over to the government for a set amount of compensation. The program ran from June 20-December 20, 2019. Compliant gun owners were treated to poor compensation and a breach of their personal data

At the end of the confiscation program the government had collected roughly 56,000 firearms. A June 2019 report from consulting firm KPMG had estimated that there were as many as 173,000 newly-prohibited firearms in the country. New Zealand gun rights group, the Council of Licensed Firearms Owners estimated that 170,000 prohibited firearms were still in the hands of Kiwis after the confiscation program

Proving that no gun control measure is ever enough for the anti-gun zealots, Ardern’s Labour government was back at work restricting firearms in June with the Arms Legislation Act 2020.

The New Zealand Police summarized the newly prohibited firearms as follows:

  • Semi-automatic pistols (semi-automatic firearms less that 762mm in overall length) that are not “small” semi-automatic pistols.

  • Note: a “small semi-automatic pistol” (excluded) is a semi-automatic pistol that:

  • has an overall length of 400 millimetres or less, excluding any silencer, pistol carbine conversion kit, or other muzzle-fitting attachment; and

  • has a barrel length of 101 millimetres or more; and

  • is capable of firing specified ammunition (ammunition used on pistol shooting ranges approved by the Commissioner) only at a muzzle velocity of 1,600 feet per second or less; and

  • is suitable for shooting on a certified pistol range.

  • Centrefire pump-action rifles that are capable of being used with a detachable magazine, or that have a non-detachable magazines (tubular or otherwise) that are capable of holding more than 10 cartridges commensurate with that firearm’s chamber size.

In addition to prohibiting new categories of firearm, the legislation cut the period for a first time firearms license from 10 to 5 years. The legislation also mandated that police notify a firearm license holder’s physician of the individual’s status as a license holder and required physicians to report to the police on the health conditions of the license holder. Moreover, the Act added new restrictions on the possession and sale of ammunition.

In order to facilitate the government’s future firearm confiscation efforts, the new law also mandated firearms registration. The firearms registry is set to be developed over the next three years.

According to Labour MP Hon Poto Williams, “This year’s buy-back will look very different to the one in 2019 as there will be no large-scale collection events,” noting, “Police will be managing the smaller buy-back through appointments at Police stations.” Compliant gun owners have been told to contact buyback2021@police.govt.nz to arrange an appointment to forfeit their firearms.

The New Zealand government has released a list of prices that the government will pay for the confiscated firearms. The compensation values vary widely based on the condition of the firearm. Presumably the government will determine the condition of a relinquished gun.

Those found in possession of a prohibited firearm face up to five years imprisonment.

In criticizing what he called “gun buyback 2.0,” New Zealand’s National Party Police Spokesman Simeon Brown stated, “The first gun buyback was merely a marketing exercise. After spending $103 million on the scheme, the Government couldn’t even confirm whether it had made New Zealand safer or if it had collected all prohibited firearms,” adding, “That’s because most law-abiding New Zealanders handed in their now-prohibited firearms, but gangs and criminals, those who pose the greatest risk to our safety, did not.”

U.S. gun owners should pay careful attention to New Zealand. The Labour government’s second assault on gun owners in as many years is further proof that gun control advocates will not be satisfied short of total civilian disarmament.

Biden's Vow For Gun Control

Gun sales on the rise amid pandemic uncertainty, Biden's vow for gun reform

BY JORDAN WILLIAMS - 01/30/21 09:56 PM EST

Originally published on The Hill.

Image courtesy of NRA-ILA

Image courtesy of NRA-ILA

Gun sales are on the rise across the U.S. with some experts predicting that gun reform policies championed by the Biden administration as well as the continuing uncertainty around the pandemic will keep gun sales high in 2021. 

A record number of background checks were performed in the past year, according to data released by the FBI, reaching over 39.6 million background checks for firearms in 2020. 

And while there’s no official data on exactly how many guns are sold in the U.S., background checks serve as a good proxy, according to Adam Winkler, Author of the book "Gunfight: The Battle over the Right to Bear Arms in America." 

Experts attribute the demand to fear and uncertainty that was sparked by the coronavirus pandemic, protests over racial injustice from last summer and the 2020 presidential election. 

The pandemic gripped the U.S. in March, leading businesses small and large to shut down, and leaving millions of people unemployed.

In the summer of 2020, nationwide protests erupted after the killing and shooting of several Black Americans including George Floyd, Breonna Taylor and Jacob Blake. The majority of the protests were peaceful, however, violence broke out in Minneapolis, Minn., as well as Kenosha, Wisc. among other cities. 

Most recently, the presidential election caused months of spotty unrest with protestors across the country alleging that the election was “stolen” from former President Trump as a result of widespread voter fraud. Tensions came to an apex when a mob of Trump’s supporters breach Capitol security early in January. 

Winkler said that people may look to guns for protection in uncertain times. 

“People feel uncertain,” Winkler said. “And when you're feeling uncertain, and you feel like you're vulnerable, a firearm is one of the things that you might look to to provide you with protection.”

Official data from the FBI on the number of background checks conducted in January is expected in the beginning of February. However Mark Oliva, communications director for The National Shooting Sports Foundation, said it’s unlikely that demand will slow down in the near future. 

“There's every indication that it's not going to slow down anytime soon,” Oliva said. “I think if you walk into any retailer right now, you’re going to see that gun case and that gun shelf is still pretty sparsely populated. That tells me that there’s still an unmet demand.” 

Heading into 2021, America is getting acclimated to President Biden, who ran on a strong pro-gun reform platform. 

Biden’s platform includes banning the sale of assault weapons and high-capacity magazines and requiring background checks for all gun sales. Gun safety advocacy groups have praised his platform as one of the toughest of any presidential candidate. 

“Simply put, a Biden presidency is the gun lobby's worst nightmare. But it's a dream come true for anyone who cares about gun safety in America,” said Rob Wilcox, deputy director of policy and strategy at Everytown for Gun Safety. 

Nico Bocour, governmental affairs director for gun reform advocacy group Giffords, predicted that America will see some gun reform measures within Biden’s first 100 days in office. 

“We believe that, you know, within the first 100 days, there is going to be a background checks bill that you will see passed,” Bocour said. “There is widespread support for universal background checks, this is something that the public has shown tremendous amount of support for over the years that support is increasing.” 

However, Philip Van Cleave, president of the Virginia Citizens Defense League, predicts that Biden’s platform will drive more people to buy guns simply out of fear. 

“If suddenly they said well you're not going to be able to buy any more cereal while everybody would run out and clean out all the cereal out of all the stores, [and] get theirs before it disappeared,” Van Cleave said.

“Same thing with guns, every time they threatened to take them away people decide it's time to buy one, and those that have one decide maybe to buy another one.” 

Winkler said this happens because for some Americans, having a gun is also a political act, rather than for self defense. 

“Many in the gun community go out and buy guns as a form of protest,” Winkler said. “Having a gun is not just having a tool for self defense in America today. Many, many people who were part of that gun community, buy guns as a political act, at least in part.”

States Eye Passing Constitutional Carry

By Tyler Yzaguirre, Second Amendment Institute
Jan. 25, 2021, 10:32AM

Image courtesy of USCCA

Image courtesy of USCCA

Gun rights lawmakers in several states want to allow people to carry concealed firearms without having to get a permit; this is known as constitutional carry.

Fifteen states already have constitutional carry laws on the books, and another nine are looking to do the same. Republican Governors in Utah and Tennessee back the idea, while the Montana bill has already passed the state House.

Other states which allow concealed carry, requires applicants to go through rigorous training, like in Washington D.C.

Such training includes a four-hour legal class, a twelve-hour generic firearm class, and a range test. Whereas more relaxed states, like Pennsylvania, require the applicant to pass a vigorous background check, and fill out and submit paperwork at their local sheriff’s office.

With constitutional carry, none of this is required.

However, you can be barred from exercising your Second Amendment right to constitutional carry if you are listed as a person prohibited.

There are many things that can land you on the person prohibited list. These follow the same items that will fail you on a NICS background check when purchasing a firearm from an FFL dealer. Examples include:

  • Pending or convicted domestic charge

  • Pending or convicted felony charge

  • Dishonorably discharged from the military

  • Adjudicated as a mental defective or committed to mental institution

  • Subject to a court-ordered restraining order

  • Addicted to, in possession of, or in use of any illegal substances (yes, this includes state-legal medicinal marijuana)

Read the full list here.

The proposed changes come after firearm sales hit historic levels last summer, amid uncertainty and safety concerns about the coronavirus pandemic, the struggling economy, and nation-wide protests.

Per ABC News:

The proposal in Utah would allow any U.S. citizen 21 and older to carry a concealed weapon without the now-required background check or weapons course. The bill does allow gun owners who want to carry a concealed weapon out of state to get a permit to do so after a background check and safety course.

Newly elected GOP Gov. Spencer Cox has said he supports the idea, in contrast to his predecessor and fellow Republican Gary Herbert, who vetoed a similar bill in 2013.

Supporters of the change argue that other state laws against such things as felons having guns and anyone carrying a firearm while intoxicated are enough to ensure guns are used safely.

“I have that right to protect myself, the Constitution says we have the right. Why are we putting a barrier for law-abiding citizens?” said Rep. Walt Brooks, the Republican lawmaker sponsoring the bill that got an early nod of approval from a House committee Friday. The software company president has represented rural southern Utah for about four years.

He pointed to a multistate study published in 2018 by the Journal of the American College of Surgeons that found loosening concealed carry permit laws didn’t lead to more homicides or violent crime. Utah does not require a permit for guns carried openly.

In Tennessee, Republican lawmakers are expected to push again to allow most adults 21 and older to carry firearms — concealed or openly — without a license that now requires a background check and training.

GOP Gov. Bill Lee backed the idea last year, though the proposal and others were put on hold amid the pandemic.

The push in Tennessee came after the GOP-dominant General Assembly relaxed the state's handgun law in 2020 by allowing people to obtain a concealed-carry-only handgun permit that didn't require them to demonstrate the ability to fire a weapon.

In Montana, the House recently passed a bill to allow people to carry concealed firearms without a permit in most places.

Similar bills that would allow or expand concealed carry without a permit have been introduced in Texas, South Carolina, Florida, Indiana, Alabama and Georgia.

Democrats Start Off 2021 With A Gun Control BANG.

By: TYLER YZAGUIRRE, Second Amendment Institute
Published: Monday, January 11, 2021

maxresdefault.jpg

Radical Democrats on Capitol Hill have no problem pushing gun control bills now that they control the House and have the tie-splitting vote (Kamala Harris) in the Senate.

For the past four years, they knew their gun control efforts would go nowhere, but now the gloves are off, and they’re ready to launch a full-fledged assault on our Second Amendment rights.

Bills introduced in the new Congress as of today include:

H.R. 121 - To provide for the hiring of 200 additional Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF) agents and investigators to enforce gun laws. - Rep. Shiela Jackson Lee, (D-TX-18)

H.R. 125 - To amend title 18, United States Code, to provide for a 7-day waiting period before a semiautomatic firearm, a silencer, armor piercing ammunition, or a large capacity ammunition magazine may be transferred. - Rep. Shiela Jackson Lee, (D-TX-18)

H.R. 127 - To provide for the licensing of firearm and ammunition possession and the registration of firearms, and to prohibit the possession of certain ammunition. - Rep. Shiela Jackson Lee, (D-TX-18)

H.R. 130 - To require the safe storage of firearms and ammunition, and to require the investigation of reports of improper storage of firearms or ammunition. - Rep. Shiela Jackson Lee, (D-TX-18)

H.R. 167 - To prohibit the transfer of a firearm at a gun show by a person who is not a federally licensed firearms dealer. - Rep. Al Green (D-TX-9)

It seems like Rep. Shiela Jackson Lee has a special hatred for law-abiding gun owners, like you and me.

This is just the beginning of what is to come over the next two years while the radical left controls the U.S. House and the U.S. Senate.

On his website, Joe Biden boasts of gun control measures he “promises to enact” while President.

These measures include:

Ban AR-15s

Ban high capacity magazines (10+)

Mandatory regsitration of long-guns and $200 fee for each

Limit the number of firearms you can purchase per month to one

Universal background checks

Federalize Red Flag Laws

Incentivize states to enact firearm purchase licenses

Safe storage law

These measures are beyond unconstitutional. If you’d like to see it on Joe Biden’s website for yourself: Here it is.

Make no mistake, these tyrannical gun-grabbers know exactly what they’re doing. They’re fully aware of the DC v. Heller decision (2008) in which the United States Supreme Court ruled the Second Amendment protects an individual right to keep and bear arms; they’re aware there have been dozens of circuit decisions supporting Heller and expanding gun rights since 2008.

They do not care.

Remember, gun control isn’t about saving American lives, it’s about control. By disarming the citizenry and having control over them, they’re unstoppable.

Will it get to the point of Nazi Germany, or socialist Venezuela where the government is killing citizens? No.

But will it get worse? Absolutely.

If Joe Biden and the radical Democrats continue to get their way and slowly chip away at our Second Amendment rights, eventually there won’t be a Second Amendment anymore. It will get to the point where purchasing a firearm is nearly impossible.

The COVID pandemic gave us a glimpse as to what that would be like:

Gun shop sues New York State due to COVID-19 regulations

Gun license delays prompt lawsuit, legislation

Joe Biden's pick for surgeon general once declared gun control as a health care issue

All in all, the radical Democrats want nothing more than to disarm and punish law-abiding citizens simply because they want control over citizens. Our country was founded on a pro-gun belief system and that citizens had the right to defend themselves, loved ones, and property.

As the late Justice Antonin Scalia authored it so brilliantly in Heller:

The Second Amendment protects an individual right to possess a firearm unconnected with service in a militia, and to use that arm for traditionally lawful purposes, such as self-defense within the home.

>> Dear Reader, the Second Amendment Institute relies on generous contributions from patriots like you, who care about securing our freedom’s future and defending our gun rights.

Please support our work with a tax-deductible contribution today of $5. Secure Link: >> Click Here <<

Over 21 Million Background Checks for Firearms in 2020

Originally posted on America’s 1st Freedom via NRA ~ by Garrett O’Leary, Assistant Editor - Wednesday, January 6, 2021

Photo credit: courtesy the NSSF

Photo credit: courtesy the NSSF

Over 21 million background checks were conducted for the purchase of a firearm in 2020, according to new data from the National Shooting Sports Foundation (NSSF). Of these more than 21 million checks conducted, the NSSF estimates that 8.4 million people purchased a firearm for the first time.

If the theme of 2020 setting gun-sales records seems familiar, that’s because it is. Simply put, last year shattered records for firearm ownership month after month, and by no small margin each time. 2020 surpassed 2019’s totals by 60%, and broke the previous annual record, set in 2016, by 34%.

“The fact that more than 21 million background checks were conducted for the sales of firearms in 2020 shows just how much value the American public places in their God-given Second Amendment rights,” said Mark Oliva, director of public affairs for the NSSF.

The sheer resiliency of the American people is also on display here, as COVID-19 introduced a myriad of challenges throughout our country last year. Not to be deterred, the American people exercised the right to keep and bear arms in record-shattering numbers amidst a global pandemic, civil unrest, and with a staunchly anti-Second Amendment administration potentially on the horizon.

“This occurred under the most challenging circumstances. Law-abiding Americans demanded to exercise their right to lawfully purchase, keep and bear arms. Some governors, mayors and even Members of Congress actively stood in the way of that and didn’t relent until faced with court action. At the same time, workers in these firearm and ammunition factories, distributors, retailers and ranges made adjustments to keep their workforce safe and protected from infection while keeping pace with the demand of the American public. That’s a testament to the determination of the American worker that makes our freedoms possible,” said Oliva.

The NSSF-adjusted data more accurately represents the number of firearms purchased in background checks by factoring out checks conducted by the National Instant Criminal Background Check System (NICS) unlikely to be used in the purchase of a firearm.

Oliva also said that these figures could very well have been even higher had distributors not run low on inventory. In short, the demand was so high that in many places, it blew out the supply.

“Retail shelves are still sparse, telling use there is still a strong demand and that elevated levels of firearm sales could continue for some time,” said Oliva. 

Should Joe Biden, Kamala Harris and other anti-freedom politicians seek to enact policies that are detrimental to our rights, 2021 may very well follow the trend. Regardless, Americans should continue to exercise their constitutional rights and to reach out to others who may not fully grasp, literally and figuratively, the importance of these rights yet.


Read original source here.

Joe Biden Is a Threat to Our Second Amendment

Biden declares gun violence a 'national health crisis' and calls for 'common sense reforms'

by Michael Lee

| December 16, 2020 10:17 AM - Originally posted on Washington Examiner

President-elect Joe Biden released a statement remembering the victims of the Sandy Hook Elementary shooting while saying that “gun violence is a national health crisis” in need of being addressed.

“But in this collective pain, you’ve helped usher in a collective and growing purpose,” Biden said on Monday. “You’ve helped us forge a consensus that gun violence is a national health crisis, and we need to address its total cost to fully heal families, communities, and our nation.”

The comments came on the eighth anniversary of the Sandy Hook shooting, which claimed the lives of 26 students and staff members and was one of the deadliest mass shootings in U.S. history.

Biden said the shooting was the “saddest day” of his Obama administration years but that he “remains in awe” of the surviving victims and how many of them have “turned their pain into purpose” in attempts to change America’s gun laws.

“I know it can feel like an impossible task,” Biden said, adding that since Sandy Hook, there have been more such tragedies across the country.

“Every year, more than 30,000 people die from gun violence across America — a statistic we would associate with war in a far-off place,” Biden continued, echoing a statistic cited by former Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton that includes suicides in its tally.

Biden went on to lament that “eight years later, there have been plenty of thoughts and prayer, but that is not enough.” Instead, Biden said the public should “fight to end this scourge on our society and enact common sense reforms.”

Biden concluded by saying that such reforms “are supported by a majority of Americans” and claimed they could “save countless lives.”

Apple security chief accused of trying to bribe sheriff’s office

Originally posted on New York Post, By Kenneth Garger

November 24, 2020 | 2:18am

Apple’s head of global security was indicted on Monday for allegedly trying to bribe a California sheriff’s office with the promise of 200 iPads in exchange for concealed-weapon permits for company employees.

In addition to Thomas Moyer, 50, the tech-giant’s chief security officer, two officers with the Santa Clara County Sheriff’s Office were also charged in the alleged scheme.

The officers are also facing bribery charges.

In California, permits are required to carry concealed firearms and county sheriffs are in charge of issuing them.

“There was no bribe, no quid pro quo,” Moyer’s attorney, Ed Swanson, told Reuters. “They went through the process the way you’re supposed to do it.”

Swanson said the promised iPad donation was separate from the permits. The lawyer also said Moyer was seeking the four permits for Apple security personnel for the protection of company workers.

Apple conducted their own investigation into the allegations and found no wrongdoing.

Support for Stricter U.S. Gun Laws at Lowest Level Since 2016

NOVEMBER 16, 2020 • BY MEGAN BRENAN

Originally posted on Gallup

https://news.gallup.com/poll/325004/support-stricter-gun-laws-lowest-level-2016.aspx


STORY HIGHLIGHTS

  • 57% want stricter gun laws, 9% less strict, 34% want them kept as they are

  • GOP support for stricter gun laws has fallen 14 points since 2019 to new 22% low

  • 25% of Americans favor a handgun ban in the U.S., near record low

WASHINGTON, D.C. -- In the absence of a high-profile mass shooting in the U.S. in 2020 and amid the coronavirus pandemic, civil unrest related to racial justice issues and the contentious presidential election campaign, Americans are less likely than they have been since 2016 to call for increased gun control. The latest majority (57%) in the U.S. who call for stricter laws covering the sale of firearms marks a seven-percentage-point decline since last year. At the same time, 34% of U.S. adults prefer that gun laws be kept as they are now, while 9% would like them to be less strict.

Gallup has been tracking the public's views on this measure since 1990, when a record-high 78% of Americans supported stricter laws for gun sales as the nation's crime rate was rising. A majority of Americans held that position until 2008. Support then fell to a low of 43% in 2011, when an equal number said gun laws should be kept as is, but calls for stricter laws increased sharply to 58% in 2012 after the massacre at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Connecticut.

Since the early 1990s, Americans' preferences for tougher gun control have generally peaked in the wake of prominent mass shootings and waned as the memory of each fades. A recent example was the 2018 school massacre in Parkland, Florida, after which support for increased gun control hit 67%. Support remained near that level last year in two readings taken after mass shootings in Dayton, Ohio, and El Paso, Texas, on consecutive days in August.


Americans' Preferences for Gun Control Vary by Demographic Group

There are sharp differences in views of gun control within a number of key demographic groups in the latest findings from Gallup's annual Crime poll, conducted Sept. 30-Oct. 15. Majorities of women, Democrats, independents, those who do not own guns, residents of the Eastern and Western U.S., and city and suburban residents all support stricter gun laws. At the same time, these groups' counterparts are more supportive of keeping gun laws as they are now or making them less strict.

Among these groups, the largest gap in support for more stringent gun laws is for partisans. The current 22% of Republicans favoring stricter laws for gun sales is the lowest for the group over the past 20 years and represents a 14-point drop since 2019. Meanwhile, the percentages of Democrats and independents calling for more gun control are near the highest recorded by Gallup since 2000. The 63-point gap between Republicans and Democrats is the highest on record over the past two decades.


Support for Handgun Ban Remains Weak

Americans' support for a ban on the possession of handguns, at 25%, is near the lowest on record in Gallup's 40-year trend. The latest reading, which is down 18 points from its 1991 high, is a slight decline from last year's 29%. Currently, 74% of U.S. adults say such a ban should not be put in place.

While there is a 31-point gap between the views of Republicans and Democrats on this measure, less than half of Democrats (41%) support a handgun ban.

Gallup's update of gun ownership in the same poll finds essentially no change in the trend from recent years. The 32% saying they personally own a gun is up slightly, but not statistically significantly, from the 30% average rate of personal gun ownership from 2017-2019.

This may seem contrary to recent news that an estimated 5 million Americans have become new gun owners thus far in 2020 amid surging gun sales; however, that number represents about 2% of the U.S. adult public, which is not enough to detect in a poll of roughly 1,000 U.S. respondents, with the standard 4-percentage-point margin of sampling error. Gallup will be looking at whether today's slightly higher rates continue in future measurements.

Bottom Line

In a year that has seen record-high gun sales, Americans' appetite for gun control is the lowest it has been since 2016, before mass shootings in Las Vegas, Nevada, and Parkland, Florida. There has not been a major mass shooting in the U.S. since mid-2019 -- which may explain the decline in support for stricter gun laws, given that the trend on this measure has shown that such events tend to drive public opinion. In addition, there has been a sharp drop in Republicans' support for stricter gun laws over the past year as the nation has dealt with the pandemic, civil unrest and the presidential election.

View complete question responses and trends (PDF download).

Learn more about how the Gallup Poll Social Series works.